<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>kineticframework Work Item Rss Feed</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/kineticframework/WorkItem/List.aspx</link><description>kineticframework Work Item Rss Description</description><item><title>Created Issue: After generation there is an error on EntityBase.Save no suitable method found to override [19774]</title><link>http://kineticframework.codeplex.com/workitem/19774</link><description>Error&amp;#9;1&amp;#9;&amp;#39;Kinetic.Business.Framework.EntityBase.Save&amp;#40;Kinetic.Business.Framework.SqlHelper&amp;#41;&amp;#39;&amp;#58; no suitable method found to override&lt;br /&gt;D&amp;#58;&amp;#92;Desktop&amp;#92;Kinetic&amp;#92;Business&amp;#92;Framework&amp;#92;Generated.EntityBase.cs&amp;#9;690&amp;#9;30&amp;#9;Kinetic.Business&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The issue can be resolved by fixing the method signature to use the SqlHelper Interface.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Change This&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;public override void Save&amp;#40;SqlHelper helper&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;public override void Save&amp;#40;IDataHelper helper&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>blake05</author><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:45:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: After generation there is an error on EntityBase.Save no suitable method found to override [19774] 20110120034521P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Fails to build under CodeSmith 5.1 [13306]</title><link>http://kineticframework.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=13306</link><description>Under the recently released CodeSmith 5.1, main.cst fails to build, and the Properties window does not initialize with the custom properties.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Examination of the build output reveals&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;c&amp;#58;&amp;#92;ProgramData&amp;#92;CodeSmith&amp;#92;v5.1&amp;#92;Template Cache&amp;#92;1876480247&amp;#92;Main_cst.cs&amp;#40;500,56&amp;#41;&amp;#58; error CS0234&amp;#58; The type or namespace name &amp;#39;CustomProperties&amp;#39; does not exist in the namespace &amp;#39;CodeSmith&amp;#39; &amp;#40;are you missing an assembly reference&amp;#63;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Solution&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;add following to Main.cst&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;&amp;#37;&amp;#64; Assembly Name&amp;#61;&amp;#34;CodeSmith.CustomProperties&amp;#34; &amp;#37;&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: khaos ** &lt;p&gt;THANKS&amp;#33; &amp;#40;5.2 also&amp;#41;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>khaos</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:14:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Fails to build under CodeSmith 5.1 [13306] 20100414071420P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Fails to build under CodeSmith 5.1</title><link>http://nusoftframework.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=13306</link><description>Under the recently released CodeSmith 5.1, main.cst fails to build, and the Properties window does not initialize with the custom properties.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Examination of the build output reveals&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;c&amp;#58;&amp;#92;ProgramData&amp;#92;CodeSmith&amp;#92;v5.1&amp;#92;Template Cache&amp;#92;1876480247&amp;#92;Main_cst.cs&amp;#40;500,56&amp;#41;&amp;#58; error CS0234&amp;#58; The type or namespace name &amp;#39;CustomProperties&amp;#39; does not exist in the namespace &amp;#39;CodeSmith&amp;#39; &amp;#40;are you missing an assembly reference&amp;#63;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Solution&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;add following to Main.cst&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;&amp;#37;&amp;#64; Assembly Name&amp;#61;&amp;#34;CodeSmith.CustomProperties&amp;#34; &amp;#37;&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>pmdye</author><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:00:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Fails to build under CodeSmith 5.1 20090522050010P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: SqlHelperBase - Raise the OnExecuted Event prior to 'nulling' of SQLCommand and clearing the parameters.</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=12610</link><description>I noticed the SqlCommand was nulled and and parameters where cleared prior to raising the OnExecuted event.  Is this an oversight&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;-Vico&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>VicoMinnocci</author><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:08:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: SqlHelperBase - Raise the OnExecuted Event prior to 'nulling' of SQLCommand and clearing the parameters. 20090216020816P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Attribtue class for DatabaseColumn needs to be explicit</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=10552</link><description>In cases where a table Attribute exists in the database and is included as a table to be modeled a referencing error can occur as the compiler looks locally first and may reference the Attribute class that inherits EntityBase and represents a table rather then the Attribute class which inherits System.Attribute.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: jfarrell ** &lt;p&gt;Easy fix would be to have DatabaseColumnAttribute explicity qualify the Attribute class to inherit from&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>jfarrell</author><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:19:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Attribtue class for DatabaseColumn needs to be explicit 20080715031948P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Attribtue class for DatabaseColumn needs to be explicit</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=10552</link><description>In cases where a table Attribute exists in the database and is included as a table to be modeled a referencing error can occur as the compiler looks locally first and may reference the Attribute class that inherits EntityBase and represents a table rather then the Attribute class which inherits System.Attribute.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>jfarrell</author><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:19:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Attribtue class for DatabaseColumn needs to be explicit 20080715031915P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Feature: Add Nullable Type Support</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=8605</link><description>Add nullable type support for properties that support null values.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: banderson ** &lt;p&gt;Thanks for the help&amp;#33;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>banderson</author><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:40:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Feature: Add Nullable Type Support 20080626044025P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Feature: Add Nullable Type Support</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=8605</link><description>Add nullable type support for properties that support null values.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: elmarg ** &lt;p&gt;Attached you find the two files &amp;#40;codesmith templates&amp;#41; that I modified in order to get support for Nullable&amp;#60;Type&amp;#62; working for rev. 17373.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>elmarg</author><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:02:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Feature: Add Nullable Type Support 20080619070247P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Feature: Add Nullable Type Support</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=8605</link><description>Add nullable type support for properties that support null values.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: elmarg ** &lt;p&gt;Hi guys, i&amp;#39;m very new to this framework and just recently downloaded and started experimenting with it. I almost immediately missed the Nullable type support for a &amp;#39;DateOfBirth&amp;#39; column in my database. Yesterday I ventured a look at the actual templates &amp;#40;based on build 17373&amp;#41; and was able to get a working version with nullable type support with only a few changes. Obviously I&amp;#39;m not sure if it is fool-proof but it is definitely working for me. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t know how this process works but if you want the modified sources I&amp;#39;ll be glad to email them to you. &lt;br /&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Elmar&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>elmarg</author><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:38:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Feature: Add Nullable Type Support 20080611093825A</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED ISSUE: _isNullable property in the ColumnInfo object is always false</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=9646</link><description>While using the NuSoft Framework I have noticed that the _isNullable property on the ColumnInfo object is always false. This causes validation errors when trying to save an entity that has a not mandatory String amongst its properties.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To resolve this issue I have added&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;if &amp;#40;reader&amp;#91;&amp;#34;IS_NULLABLE&amp;#34;&amp;#93;.ToString&amp;#40;&amp;#41; &amp;#61;&amp;#61; &amp;#34;YES&amp;#34;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt; _isNullable &amp;#61; true&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;in the constructor of the ColumnInfo class. Furthermore, I have also altered the GetValidationErrors method of the EntityBase class as in the attachment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This solution means however that the nullable property is database driven not DataObjectField attribute driven. Any additional solution&amp;#47;comments are more then welcome&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am using changeset 15851.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Version release.</description><author>RossCode</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:16:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED ISSUE: _isNullable property in the ColumnInfo object is always false 20080404031622A</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED ISSUE: Primary Key Columns with Name "ID"</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=9496</link><description>Hi All&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I look after a database which has the convention of using &amp;#34;ID&amp;#34; as the Primary Key for all columns.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In using the Nusoft Framework &amp;#40;15770&amp;#41;, I have set extended properties for all the columns to be &amp;#34;TableName &amp;#43; Id&amp;#34; which works nicely until the GetColumnNameWithoutIdSuffix function is called in entity.generated.cst which returns &amp;#34;&amp;#34; for the ColumnName.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Can I suggest the following fix&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;public string GetColumnNameWithoutIdSuffix&amp;#40;ColumnSchema column&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;string name &amp;#61; &amp;#34;&amp;#34;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;string columnName &amp;#61; column.Name&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;if&amp;#40;column.ExtendedProperties&amp;#91;&amp;#34;NSFx_EntityPropertyName&amp;#34;&amp;#93; &amp;#33;&amp;#61; null&amp;#41; &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;&amp;#9;columnName &amp;#61; &amp;#40;string&amp;#41;column.ExtendedProperties&amp;#91;&amp;#34;NSFx_EntityPropertyName&amp;#34;&amp;#93;.Value&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;if&amp;#40;columnName.EndsWith&amp;#40;&amp;#34;id&amp;#34;, System.StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;&amp;#9;name &amp;#61; GetPascalCaseName&amp;#40;columnName.Substring&amp;#40;0, columnName.Length - 2&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;else&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;&amp;#9;name &amp;#61; GetPascalCaseName&amp;#40;columnName&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;return name&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Version release.</description><author>RossCode</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:16:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED ISSUE: Primary Key Columns with Name "ID" 20080404031622A</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED ISSUE: Excluded Tables Not Working Correctly</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=9035</link><description>Relationships to excluded tables doesn&amp;#39;t appear to be ignored as they should be.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Version release.</description><author>RossCode</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:16:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED ISSUE: Excluded Tables Not Working Correctly 20080404031621A</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED FEATURE: Add Paging support to queries</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=8603</link><description>This should be database based paging and also support custom sorting.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Version release.</description><author>RossCode</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:16:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED FEATURE: Add Paging support to queries 20080404031621A</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED FEATURE: Add Refresh Method to Entities</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=8602</link><description>Allow for entities to be refreshed from the database through a simple method call.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Version release.</description><author>RossCode</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:16:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED FEATURE: Add Refresh Method to Entities 20080404031620A</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED FEATURE: Add Logging Support</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=8601</link><description>Add logging support. Should be through a provider and be an optional include.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Version release.</description><author>RossCode</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:16:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED FEATURE: Add Logging Support 20080404031620A</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED FEATURE: Add Validation Support</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=8600</link><description>Add validation support for entities. This should be an option, as it will require a third party library. We will validate null&amp;#47;not null, as well as length of strings, while giving users the ability to add their own custom validations.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Version release.</description><author>RossCode</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:16:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED FEATURE: Add Validation Support 20080404031619A</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED FEATURE: Set Entity Defaults based on Database Default Values</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=8599</link><description>We should read the database for default values and use those as default property values when creating a new entity.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Version release.</description><author>RossCode</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:16:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED FEATURE: Set Entity Defaults based on Database Default Values 20080404031619A</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED FEATURE: Enhance FindEntity and FindEntities to work like EntityComparer</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=8598</link><description>EntityComparer works with multiple properties, but FindEntity and FindEntities does not. They should be changed so they work more alike.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Version release.</description><author>RossCode</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:16:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED FEATURE: Enhance FindEntity and FindEntities to work like EntityComparer 20080404031618A</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED ISSUE: Issues with Composite Foreign Key Relationships</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=8597</link><description>There is a naming conflict with composite foreign key relationships when you have multiple relationships to the same table. There is also some potential naming conflicts that need to be resolved.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Version release.</description><author>RossCode</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:16:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED ISSUE: Issues with Composite Foreign Key Relationships 20080404031618A</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED ISSUE: Add Support For timestamp Field Types</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/nusoftframework/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=8595</link><description>We currently do not support timestamp fields. We need to ensure we can support those fields&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Version release.</description><author>RossCode</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:16:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED ISSUE: Add Support For timestamp Field Types 20080404031617A</guid></item></channel></rss>